From Jim: This is tenth in a series of seventeen blog posts on workplace bullying and related topics running Monday, July 2, 2012 to Sunday, August 12, 2012.
One pastor writes:
One pastor writes:
“Mobbing”
fits to a T what happened to me in the last church I served. I still need to
come to terms with what happened because I couldn’t imagine it even existing,
let alone happening to me. All I knew is
that it was abusive and it didn't make any sense. It started small, then spread.
I resigned feeling like a complete failure. Ultimately, I just wanted out. It's been six months, and I still struggle
with the sense of failure and the dejection that goes along with it.
Heinz Leymann, the Swedish psychologist whose
pioneering research laid the foundation for current thinking on bullying,
defines mobbing as "hostile and unethical communication which is directed
in a systematic way by one or a number of persons mainly toward one individual…
These actions take place often (almost every day) and over a long period (at
least for six months) and, because of this frequency and duration, result in
considerable psychic, psychosomatic and social misery. "
Kenneth Westhues: “[associates] in a given [organization]
identify in their midst a fundamentally flawed character, an intolerable
workmate whom they appropriately marginalize, punish, and seek to eliminate.”
MOBBING IS...
- Emotional abuse in the
workplace.
- "Ganging up"
by co-workers, subordinates or superiors, to force someone out of the
workplace through rumor, innuendo, intimidation, humiliation,
discrediting, and isolation.
- Malicious, nonsexual, non-racial,
general harassment.
- Mobbing is also a
wolfpack mentality
All the observed actions have the common
denominator of being based on the desire to "get at a person" or
punish him/her, and so include:
- The victim's
reputation (rumor mongering, slandering, holding up to ridicule).
- Communication toward
the victim (the victim is not allowed to express him/herself, no one is
speaking to him or her, continual loud-voiced criticism and meaningful
glances).
- The social
circumstances (the victim is isolated).
- The nature of or the
possibility of performing in his/her work (no work given, humiliating or
meaningless work tasks).
- Violence and threats
of violence.
Here is Kenneth Westhues’ Checklist of Mobbing
Indicators, from Workplace Mobbing in Academe:
- By standard criteria
of job performance, the target is at least average, probably above
average.
- Rumours and gossip
circulate about the target’s supposed misdeeds: “Did you hear what she did
last week?”
- The target is not
invited to meetings or voted onto committees, is excluded or excludes
self.
- Collective focus on a
critical, "defining" incident that “shows what kind of man he really is.”
- Shared conviction that
the target needs some kind of formal punishment, “to be taught a lesson.”
- Unusual timing of the
decision to punish, e. g., apart from the annual performance review.
- Emotion-laden,
defamatory rhetoric about the target in oral and written communications.
- Formal expressions of
collective negative sentiment toward the target, e. g. a vote of censure,
signatures on a petition, meeting to discuss what to do about the target.
- High value on secrecy,
confidentiality, and collegial solidarity among the mobbers.
- Loss of diversity of
argument, so that it becomes dangerous to “speak up for” or defend the
target.
- The adding up of the
target’s real or imagined venial sins to make a mortal sin that cries for
action.
- The target is seen as
personally abhorrent, with no redeeming qualities; stigmatizing,
exclusionary labels are applied.
- Disregard of
established procedures, as mobbers take matters into their own hands.
- Resistance to
independent, outside review of sanctions imposed on the target.
- Outraged response to
any appeals for outside help the target may make.
- Mobbers’ fear of
violence from target, target’s fear of violence from mobbers, or both.
Links:
Where it all began: Heinz Leymann’s Mobbing Encyclopedia. Leymann’s pioneering research has laid the
foundation for the understanding of bullying and mobbing today.
Have a story to tell? Email
me.
In my experience, mobbing often seems to begin with someone who is either influential or powerful in some way singling someone out as unacceptable. The crowd either conciously or not aligns themselves against the victim.
ReplyDeleteYou're right, the crowd/bystanders often has the power. If they cry foul the bully(s) can be corrected, or the crowd can end up giving active or passive support to the bully through their acquiescence or their silence. One note: my first mentor on bullying suggested I go with the term target rather than victim, as victim is loaded with so many disempowering connotations. Thank you for reading and for your thoughts!
ReplyDeleteJim Flom